> On 2 Nov 2019, at 11:26 am, Jerome Kasper <neon.king.fr@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Le 01/11/2019 à 21:47, Tracey Emery a écrit :
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:02:49PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:24:01PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>>>> OpenBSD cvs works on the "MAIN" branch by default. This diff moves got
>>>> to using "main" by default rather than "master". As a side benefit, it
>>>> also avoids using the potentially loaded term "master".
>>> I am fine with this change. Apart from the negative connotations of
>>> the terminology, promoting the idea that branch names are always chosen
>>> by convention is good. Having a different default branch name than Git
>>> helps to spread the idea that branch names aren't necessarily the same
>>> everywhere.
>>> 
>> Is this going to require a new got branch rename function? It's going to
>> get confusing to go between got generated trees and git generated trees
>> when managing both with got. I don't know. Maybe it doesn't matter and
>> after time, everyone will get used to the change.
> I do agree with Tracey , I am also wondering if this is not going to create some confusion
> just to match cvs behaviour for the fun of "being different" (no offense intended)
> Do we need to create volountary mismatches with usual git behaviour? It would create
> harder sync with usual various git repositories,because it would probably mean overhead
> in other developpement cases.

I also agree with Tracey; it’s inconducive to seamless integration with most existing practices.
And an unexpected behaviour considering the synopsis on gameoftrees.org

>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Same here.
> Stefan, you're GoT father, choice belongs to you :)

Very clever. GoTfather is great!
And completely agree: the GoTfather’s decision will be supported regardless.

> 
> Kind regards,
> Jerome