On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:32:29AM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I missed that there is another pair, scroll_up() and scroll_down().
> These do need a "view" parameter--well, scroll_down() does--so
> should ref_scroll_*, tree_scroll_* also take one to keep all these
> functions similar?

Sure. And perhaps we could rename 'scroll_up/down' to log_scroll_up,
log_scroll_down since they operate on the log view. The current
names are historical; the log view was implemented first.