Stefan Sperling:

> > -scroll_up(struct tog_view *view,
> > -    struct commit_queue_entry **first_displayed_entry, int maxscroll,
> > -    struct commit_queue *commits)
> > +log_scroll_up(struct tog_view *view, int maxscroll)
> 
> Any reason you are not passing a struct tog_log_view_state parameter here
> instead of struct tog_view? Is it for consistency with log_scroll_down()?

For consistency, yes.
In fact, all of {log,ref,tree}_scroll_{up,down} now take a view
parameter, but log_scroll_down() is the only one that needs it.
For the others, the view state would suffice.

> If so, I don't think there's a problem with these function taking different
> types for their first parameters. log_scroll_down() can be special.

I'm happy to change the others to take a state parameter if you
prefer.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de