On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:20:44PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Stefan Sperling:
> 
> > I think it makes more sense to give control over the allocation to the
> > open_tree_view() function, implying that the deallocation should only
> > occur in close_tree_view(). This fixes the double-tree you've described.
> 
> Makes sense.
> 
> > Can you still get tog to misbehave with this patch?
> 
> That fixes the problem and I haven't found any new ones.
> 
> There's some cruft left over that you forgot:

Thanks! I've just committed both patches.