"GOT", but the "O" is a cute, smiling pufferfish. Index | Thread | Search

From:
"Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@sudo.ws>
Subject:
Re: Workflow question, maybe bug or unclear usage.
To:
Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>
Cc:
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:32:27 -0700

Download raw body.

Thread 
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:29:03 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:

> The value we are overwriting is "UNKNOWN", which cannot be acted upon.
> And we are likely filling in correct information. So I do not see a real
> downside to overwriting d_type.

I think writing to d_type is fine.  I was just pointing out the
portability issues with using d_type without wrapping it in some
way.

 - todd