"GOT", but the "O" is a cute, smiling pufferfish. Index | Thread | Search

From:
Bryan Steele <brynet@gmail.com>
Subject:
Re: GoT Landlock fixes
To:
gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date:
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:09:03 -0500

Download raw body.

Thread
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Micka??l Sala??n <mic@digikod.net> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed Omar Polo added support for Landlock to the Linux version of
> > Game Of Trees [1]. This is great! However, the handled filesystem
> > access is only LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE, and it will still be
> > allowed to do multiple filesystem-related actions (e.g. write to
> > files, remove files???). I don't know much about Game Of Trees but,
> > according to the commit message, I think you would like to revoke any
> > (currently supported) filesystem access. You should then add the 12
> > remaining access rights [2]. There is also a typo in the errno check,
> > it should be EOPNOTSUPP (not ENOTSUP). You'll find a small patch
> > attached. Let me know if I can help.
> >
> > In a nutshell, the ruleset's handled_access_fs is required for
> > backward and forward compatibility (i.e. the kernel and user space may
> > not know each other's supported restrictions), hence the need to be
> > explicit about the denied-by-default access rights.
> 
> Yes, the original diff had all the actions, but when I picked that up
> again before it got committed I got confused and dropped the others (I
> was sure the checks not listed there were dropped by default.)  I humbly
> apologies to everyone for the incredibly stupid mistake, I don't have
> any excuse.

I wouldn't be so hard on yourself, this is honestly pretty silly. If I
understand things right, it means that if any addition access rights
are added later on, that they would be allowed until all software has
been explictly updated to deny it. That seems like a closed-open design,
no?

> Regarding the ENOTSUP/EOPNOTSUPP mistake, I thought that on linux the
> two errno were defined to the same value, but I agree on the change
> obviously (this point was raised by Brian too recently.)
> 
> Thanks a lot for reviewing the diff and fixing my mistake!
> 
> > Regards,
> >  Micka??l
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > https://git.gameoftrees.org/gitweb/?p=got-portable.git;a=commit;h=97799ccd4b67a81f97039305d4fdd66588da9962
> > [2] https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/landlock.html#filesystem-flags
> >
> > [2. text/x-patch; 0001-portable-extend-support-for-Landlock-and-fix-error-h.patch]...
> 
>