On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 09:57:06AM +0300, Mikhail wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:17:50PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > But that's not what ^D and ^U do in less(1) or vi(1).
> > 
> > There they scroll up/down _half_ a page.
> 
> Personally, I can use full page scroll with those bindings, since I use
> only 'u' and 'Ctrl+f' (last one was already there).
> 
> Do you think full compatibility would be better?

In my opinion it would make sense to match less(1) behaviour and implement
half-page scroll for ^D and ^U. Or only offer the full-page scroll bindings
used by less(1), i.e. delete our ^D and ^U keybindings again.