On 2022/09/03 14:26:18 +0200, Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> > thanks for the pointer!  I was a bit too lazy here.  I like httpd'
> > url_decode, here's a new version of the diff using it.
> > 
> > There's one thing that I don't get in the httpd' url_decode function though:
> > 
> >   569	/* Encoding character is followed by two hex chars */
> >   570	if (!(isxdigit((unsigned char)p[1]) &&
> >   571	    isxdigit((unsigned char)p[2])))
> >   572		return (NULL);
> >   573
> > 
> > shouldn't be like in diff below?
> 
> Well, the xdigit checking logic is equivalent (De Morgan's law) between
> the two versions.

Wooops, i misread the parethesis, the not is applied to the whole
expression.  Yep, it's the same.

> Plus your check also rejects "0x00". 
> 
> ok for the diff.