On 23-01-21 08:59PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 23-01-21 11:18AM, Dave Voutila wrote:
> 
> Mark Jamsek <mark@jamsek.com> writes:
> 
> > I believe this happens because when we refresh() in main, it is after
> > having deallocated our windows. As such, there is no output to be
> > redrawn.  It looks like the vi code performs this line deletion to move
> > all lines up and insert a blank line at the bottom before releasing
> > window resources, so the final refresh() still has output to send to the
> > screen.
> >
> > A solution is to do this in the view_loop() once we know the user is
> > quitting tog (Q), or killing the current window (q) when it's the last
> > one remaining. In the first case, we need to check if there are other
> > windows and do the line deletion on them too. In the second case, we
> > also need to then make sure tog doesn't redraw the full window (i.e.,
> > restore the line we deleted), so we set the done flag and bypass
> > a redraw.
> >
> > As a small optimisation, in case there is more than one window (i.e.,
> > the user has input Q from a nested child window), use wnoutrefresh() and
> > then call doupdate(); this saves repeated screen updates.
> >
> > Does the below diff produce the desired behaviour?
> >
> 
> It does for me! As well as when using what naddy mentioned:
> 
> $ xterm -xrm 'XTerm*titeInhibit: 1'

...

> Yes, it does!  I also tried various combinations of split-screen
> layout and it all works as expected.

Great! Thanks, dv and naddy, for testing with and without alternate
screen buffer enabled in different layouts (we have a few combinations
available :). And thanks, naddy, for the vi hint!

ok to commit?

-- 
Mark Jamsek <fnc.bsdbox.org>
GPG: F2FF 13DE 6A06 C471 CA80  E6E2 2930 DC66 86EE CF68