Download raw body.
rebase suffers '?' conflicts
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:40:06PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Stefan Sperling: > > > Here is a more complete diff which implements the fix for rebase, > > histedit, and merge. With an added safeguard for files which appear > > in added status during the revert step but were not merged into the > > work tree as part of the most recently rebased/edited/merged commit. > > This works for my long-suffering test case. > The added safeguard case also works. > > > Also adds test coverage. > > > > OK? > > OK as far as I'm concerned, although I don't fully understand the > code. I found a cosmetic pasto, though: > > > +get_paths_added_between_commits(struct got_pathlist_head *added_paths, > ... > > + } else { > > + if (asprintf(&abspath, "/%s", pe->path) == -1) { > > + err = got_error_from_errno("strdup"); > asprintf > > + goto done; > > + } Thanks, fixed in the committed version. I also noticed that memory for abspath was leaked in this loop and I have fixed that as well.
rebase suffers '?' conflicts