I'm fine with that.

On May 7, 2023 2:02:33 AM MDT, Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> wrote:
>On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 05:05:56PM -0600, Tracey Emery wrote:
>> No is a valid configuration, which is why it was listed. But cool idea and near catch, regardless. Yes no, on off, true false. At least my brain says that was the original idea.
>
>The man page displays "on | off" for such settings.
>
>Supporting both "no" and "on" as valid syntax with an opposite meaning
>could easily result in accidental misconfiguration.
>Should we remove "yes/no" from the syntax to prevent this?


-- 
Tracey Emery
Sent from my phone.