Download raw body.
regress: do not use job control in a non-interactive shell
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:26:52PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > In practice, timeout(1) is now available across Linux and all BSDs > (Free, Net, Open, Dragonfly), so I guess avoiding it is a pointless > exercise. And also MacOS it seems. At least I haven't heard of this being a problem there, either. > I'm still unhappy about > * the use of %1 in a non-interactive shell, > * setting but never resetting a trap that swats at some process, > * exiting on error without terminating the server and relying on > timeout to kill it. Yes, I agree that these issues should be fixed. Could you tweak your diff to this effect, while leaving the timeout in place? Or are these two approaches incompatible somehow?
regress: do not use job control in a non-interactive shell