On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:01:25PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> In my early sha256 I've used `idlen' to parametrize the digest length,
> but it's ambigous since it could refer both to the digest length or to
> the digest _string_ length.
> 
> I'd like to standardize in digest_len / digest_string_len, even if
> requires a few more chars than `idlen'.
> 
> Diff below renames all the offender (the rest of the tree is using these
> names already.)
> 
> Thoughs/oks?

Sure, I like this.