Download raw body.
got patch: lock the worktree
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:38:23PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote: > noticed while working on the path_info() stuff. we should definitely > lock exclusively the worktree since we may update the fileindex. > The way the fileindex is written (temp file + rename) is safe against > concurrent modifications, but could still mean that another concurrent > write operation could interfer with a patch operation. > > it's not a new thing, i believe it's there since i wrote got patch :/ ok
got patch: lock the worktree