On 05/12/24 18:44, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 03:40:51PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> sorry for the delay!
>>
>>
>> On 02/12/24 18:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> dump_fcgi_record() gets called for a length that is at least the size
>>> of the header, but the function also processes parts of the body. Add
>>> a length check to skip the body if the buffer is too short.
>>>
>>> ok?
>> Looks fine to me, but what about deferring the call to dump_fcgi_record() in fcgi_parse_record() by a couple of lines? Likewise, the other call can be just changed to dump_fcgi_record_header() since it's called on a just constructed header.
>>
>> I think it's cleaner if dump_fcgi_record() is defined to work only on a fully-read fcgi record.
> Oh, yes, that approach seems better.
>
> Is this ok?

yes, thank you! ok op@