On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 04:11:06PM +1100, Mark Jamsek wrote:
> Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 03:50:37AM +1100, Mark Jamsek wrote:
> > > And here's the actual updated diff; sorry for the noise!
> > 
> > ok by me
> 
> Thanks, stsp! I've realised a problem with the diff in the error case:
> it leaks tree_view's member objects because free(tree_view) is wrong,
> we need to call view_close(tree_view).
> 
> Also, open_tree_view() already calls view_close() (and close_tree_view()
> if tree_view's close() function pointer has not already been assigned)
> in all of its error paths, which simplifies things a fair bit and makes
> for a much nicer fix.

Indeed. ok again.
I've briefly tested this diff as well and it fixes the segfault as expected.