From: Tracey Emery <tracey@traceyemery.net>
Subject: Re: add remove but keep files
To: gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:04:42 -0700

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> 
> Hmm, that seems kind of long-winded. Could we use a single sentence like:
>  'got status' will report affected file as deleted until the next commit,
>  and as unversioned after the next commit.
> 
> Or perhaps documenting this is not such a good idea after all?
> status 'D' and '?' are kind of obvious expected results.
> 
> Your call :)
> 
> Looks great otherwise!

I think we are fine with the one liner: Keep affected files on disk. Of
course, I need to redo the patch to integrate with your work in
schedule_for_deletion, so, I'll pump out another diff for review before
commiting.

-- 

Tracey Emery