From: Tracey Emery Subject: Re: add remove but keep files To: gameoftrees@openbsd.org Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:10:34 -0700 On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 01:04:42PM -0700, Tracey Emery wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > Hmm, that seems kind of long-winded. Could we use a single sentence like: > > 'got status' will report affected file as deleted until the next commit, > > and as unversioned after the next commit. > > > > Or perhaps documenting this is not such a good idea after all? > > status 'D' and '?' are kind of obvious expected results. > > > > Your call :) > > > > Looks great otherwise! > > I think we are fine with the one liner: Keep affected files on disk. Of > course, I need to redo the patch to integrate with your work in > schedule_for_deletion, so, I'll pump out another diff for review before > commiting. > > -- > > Tracey Emery Nevermind. It was obvious what you did. Committed. -- Tracey Emery