From: Stefan Sperling Subject: Re: fix ibuf memory leak To: Tracey Emery Cc: gameoftrees@openbsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 11:35:46 +0200 On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Tracey Emery wrote: > Hello, > > While testing gotwebd, I noticed memory growing quite rapidly. After an > eternity if debugging, I finally tracked it down to an unfreed ibuf. The > ibuf is opened in start_pack_privsep_child in lib/object.c. This frees > it in got_pack_stop_privsep_chil in lib/pack.c, right before > pack->privsep_child is freed. > > When reloading the gotwebd index, this seems to stop the memory bloat. > > ok? > > -- > > Tracey Emery > > diff 779e1159b25b2aa115e6b42f51003b7e2fa7c06b /home/tracey/src/got > blob - 137217342b5f0eb662a63182136a6750ffa7e2af > file + lib/pack.c > --- lib/pack.c > +++ lib/pack.c > @@ -552,6 +552,7 @@ got_pack_stop_privsep_child(struct got_pack *pack) Just a side note, it looks like got_pack_stop_privsep_child() could be a static function? It is not called from anywhere else. If we decide to change this, we'll probably want to write a separate patch. > err = got_privsep_wait_for_child(pack->privsep_child->pid); > if (close(pack->privsep_child->imsg_fd) == -1 && err == NULL) > err = got_error_from_errno("close"); Shouldn't we also call imsg_clear() here? That would match what got_repo_close() is doing. imsg_clear frees memory allocated for the ibuf internally, and might also close file descriptors. Are these still being leaked with your patch? > + free(pack->privsep_child->ibuf); Note that got_repo_close() checks whether privsep_child->imsg_fd == -1, before it calls imsg_clear(ibuf). got_repo_close() code should probably check whether ibuf is NULL such that got_pack_stop_privsep_child() could set it to NULL here, after freeing it. > free(pack->privsep_child); > pack->privsep_child = NULL; > return err; > >