From: Ted Bullock <tbullock@comlore.com>
Subject: Re: Workflow question, maybe bug or unclear usage.
To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, gameoftrees@openbsd.org, Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:22:43 -0700

On 2022-01-29 6:17 a.m., Stefan Sperling wrote:
> cvs does not use unveil, which makes it difficult to infer a common baseline.
> Could you try your 'got status' NFS test with unveil disabled?

Alright, with unveil disabled, on nfs with an older sparc64 cpu.
Slightly more than twice as performant. I'm quite surprised honestly.

$ time got status
    4m26.37s real     0m21.44s user     0m50.38s system

-- 
Ted Bullock <tbullock@comlore.com>