From: Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>
Subject: Re: [got-portable] landlock support, second try
To: Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com>
Cc: gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 12:27:22 +0100

On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> here's a revised diff.  it's equivalent in practice to the previous one,
> but hopefully less scary :)

Thanks, this looks more compact and nicer indeed.

> P.S.: now that I think of it, there's still a thing that can be
> improved.  I went with compat/landlock.c because it was an easy way to
> add the support, but should we move that file elsewhere?

I don't see anything wrong with it living at compat/landlock.c,
and I don't have a better suggestion.