From: Mark Jamsek Subject: Re: [rfc] compound keymaps with prefixed count modifier like vi(1) To: Omar Polo Cc: gameoftrees@openbsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:29:38 +1000 On 22-06-23 12:24am, Mark Jamsek wrote: > On 22-06-22 04:08pm, Omar Polo wrote: > > Mark Jamsek wrote: > > > On 22-06-21 06:56pm, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 01:08:49AM +1000, Mark Jamsek wrote: > > > > Anyway, don't mind my questions, I've realized that most of the times > > when something doesn't work as I expect it's actually for a good reason > > and my expectations were wrong in the first place :) > > > > I prefer the timeout approach, but I'm happy to change it if you think > it's better? I don't have any real argument apart from that's just what > I'm accustomed to so I haven't even given much thought to what could be > the "better" approach. > Actually, once we make the timeout configurable, users could set it arbitrarily high so there would effectively be no timeout, making it more like less(1). I guess that's one way to cater to both models. -- Mark Jamsek GPG: F2FF 13DE 6A06 C471 CA80 E6E2 2930 DC66 86EE CF68