From: Thomas Adam <thomas@xteddy.org>
Subject: Re: gotwebd - CGI  instead of FCGI
To: Simon Harrison <info@simonh.uk>
Cc: gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:50:38 +0100

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 12:19:25PM +0100, Simon Harrison wrote:
> This is probably more for the portable version. My question is: could
> we have a plain CGI version as FCGI is a bit harder to configure on
> Apache.
> 
> I know people may scream "but it's sooooo slow!", however I run
> Mercurial's hgweb on a server and am quite happy with the speed.

I am not sure this makes much difference, to be honest.  fcgi is configurable
under Apache.

I certainly don't want to maintain a plain CGI version in gotwebd in
-portable, unless it's upstreamed officially.

Kindly,
Thomas