"GOT", but the "O" is a cute, smiling pufferfish. Index | Thread | Search

From:
Tracey Emery <tracey@traceyemery.net>
Subject:
Re: tog add century
To:
"Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@sudo.ws>
Cc:
Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>, Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>, gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:42:54 -0700

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Tracey Emery:

    tog add century

  • On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 07:38:32AM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
    > On Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:35:03 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
    > 
    > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 09:08:08AM -0700, Tracey Emery wrote:
    > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:32:49AM -0700, Tracey Emery wrote:
    > > > > > 
    > > > > > Here's a trivial patch to do this. Would anyone be opposed to it?
    > > > > 
    > > > > Looks fine to me. Regress test would have to be altered again.
    > > > > 
    > > > > > 
    > > > 
    > > > Here's a diff to address all of it, if approved.
    > >
    > > Perhaps we should just do what xkcd recommends?
    > > This way, if anyone complains, we just can point them at 
    > > https://xkcd.com/1179/ and close this debate.
    > 
    > That makes the most sense to me.
    > 
    >  - todd
    
    I like the format. Would it still be desireable to look at dropping the
    century based on terminal width at some point, or is closing the debate
    finally closing the debate?
    
    -- 
    
    Tracey Emery
    
    
  • Tracey Emery:

    tog add century