"GOT", but the "O" is a cute, smiling pufferfish. Index | Thread | Search

From:
Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>
Subject:
Re: got histedit -m: edit log messages only
To:
Tracey Emery <tracey@traceyemery.net>
Cc:
gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:43:47 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:10:10AM -0700, Tracey Emery wrote:
> > +Edit log messages only.
> > +This option is a quick equivalent to a histedit script which edits
> > +only log messages but otherwise uses every commit as-is.
> 
> Should this be "leaves every commit as-is," or am I misunderstanding?

Yes, if that sounds better to you as a native speaker that works for me.

My goal is to convey that the resulting script looks like:

 pick adcfde123456...
 mesg
 pick 09876dcbafgh...
 mesg

And so on.

The term 'pick' came from Mercurial, but "the commit will be picked"
just sounds weird to me. The effect of 'pick' is documented as
"the commit will be used". This is where "used" came from and I
have carried this phrasing over to several places in the man page.

Though I'll admit "use" may not be the greatest way to phrase it,
and it's apparently unclear that the reader is supposed to associate
the "pick" command when reading this.

Other ideas? Should we just say "picked"?