On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:42:25PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> > my favourite sport is getting side-tracked.  i was about to work on
> > something else when i thought of cleaning some old branches i don't
> > need:
> > 
> > 	% got branch -d split -d gotwebd -d wip/drop-lpanel -d fold-author
> > 	Deleted refs/heads/fold-author: ffcca5c6dc37ddd50a76
> > 	%
> > 
> > hum.
> > 
> > diff belows allows to use multiple -d as arguments to `got branch'.  I
> > followed `got send' in this case, but now that i write this i'm thinking
> > if i should have followed `got ref'...
> 
> We had this discussion back in May already, but it did not conclude.
> See the thread with "Subject: got branch: support multiple -d options";
> 
> You took part in that conversation so you might still have it stored?
> Otherwise, I could bounce these messages to you again.
> (Hmm, we should probably have a public list archive somewhere...)

Bein on marc.info would be swell. I regularly delete mail and often have
to got back to lists.openbsd.org to find something that I probably
overzealously d'd.

> 

-- 

Tracey Emery