On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 06:56:24PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I've been tempted to replace all instances of fseek(), but back
> when I grepped the got tree the last time, they all took 0 as
> argument, so the parameter type is moot.
 
No harm in changing them to fseeko, just in case someone ends up
copying such chunks of code to use them for a different purpose.