"GOT", but the "O" is a cute, smiling pufferfish. Index | Thread | Search

From:
Tracey Emery <tracey@traceyemery.net>
Subject:
Re: gotwebd: fix briefs/tags navigation overlap
To:
Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com>
Cc:
Mark Jamsek <mark@jamsek.com>, gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 07:34:23 -0700

Download raw body.

Thread
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:00:49AM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2023/02/02 16:21:02 +1100, Mark Jamsek <mark@jamsek.com> wrote:
> > On 23-02-01 07:56AM, Tracey Emery wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 08:07:13PM +1100, Mark Jamsek wrote:
> > > > On 23-02-01 09:26AM, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > > > On 2023/02/01 13:40:43 +1100, Mark Jamsek <mark@jamsek.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Just a suggestion to think about but please disregard if you don't like
> > > > > > it...
> 
> I've committed the diff (including the arrow ;-)  thanks!
> 
> I've kept the center alignment for personal preference but fine with
> me to change it again to be whatever we like.

Thanks! And, your preference is fine! That's what custom css is for ;)

> 
> actually, we could add the arrows also to next and prev... :)
> 
> > > > > I forgot that there was an unicode arrow like that, and since i wasn't
> > > > > sure that inlining a bit of svg would be accepted I avoided adding
> > > > > icons.  but fwiw i like it!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tracey was even thinking of using a bit of js (if available) to load
> > > > > the next entries dinamically, which would make the more with an arrow
> > > > > particularly nice.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not really keen on using js but I'll leave those decisions to you
> > > > and Tracey. I must admit it would be nice to load entries like that
> > > > though.
> 
> maybe i had to specify that i'm not keen on doing it myself neither ^^'
> 
> > > I'm not terribly keen on introducing js either, but it is a necessary
> > > grossness when using the html dom stuff. Unless, we can brain a clever
> > > way around it, but i'm not sure of any browser tricks that don't use js.
> > > I am a bit behind in keeping up on that tech.
> 
> i'm quite sure you can't do something like that without js.
> 
> > I agree; as much as I'm not keen about it, it's basically necessary. I'm
> > also unaware of any workarounds but I'll ask Stephan and see if there is
> > some alternative option
> 

-- 

Tracey Emery