On 2023/02/02 16:21:02 +1100, Mark Jamsek <mark@jamsek.com> wrote:
> On 23-02-01 07:56AM, Tracey Emery wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 08:07:13PM +1100, Mark Jamsek wrote:
> > > On 23-02-01 09:26AM, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > > On 2023/02/01 13:40:43 +1100, Mark Jamsek <mark@jamsek.com> wrote:
> > > > > Just a suggestion to think about but please disregard if you don't like
> > > > > it...

I've committed the diff (including the arrow ;-)  thanks!

I've kept the center alignment for personal preference but fine with
me to change it again to be whatever we like.

actually, we could add the arrows also to next and prev... :)

> > > > I forgot that there was an unicode arrow like that, and since i wasn't
> > > > sure that inlining a bit of svg would be accepted I avoided adding
> > > > icons.  but fwiw i like it!
> > > > 
> > > > Tracey was even thinking of using a bit of js (if available) to load
> > > > the next entries dinamically, which would make the more with an arrow
> > > > particularly nice.
> > > 
> > > I'm not really keen on using js but I'll leave those decisions to you
> > > and Tracey. I must admit it would be nice to load entries like that
> > > though.

maybe i had to specify that i'm not keen on doing it myself neither ^^'

> > I'm not terribly keen on introducing js either, but it is a necessary
> > grossness when using the html dom stuff. Unless, we can brain a clever
> > way around it, but i'm not sure of any browser tricks that don't use js.
> > I am a bit behind in keeping up on that tech.

i'm quite sure you can't do something like that without js.

> I agree; as much as I'm not keen about it, it's basically necessary. I'm
> also unaware of any workarounds but I'll ask Stephan and see if there is
> some alternative option