On 2023/11/03 11:01:50 +0100, Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:20:13AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> > Should we also start to use ibuf_fd_set() instead of
> > reaching into the struct?
> 
> Sure, why not.

Then the diff would be this.  I'm not particularly compelled to commit
it, since the main interesting thing about ibuf_fd_set() seems to be
that it closes the the previous fd passed (if any).  Here we always
create a fresh ibuf and send it.

diff /home/op/w/got
commit - ac4f092c7c8e090ee733c90b8b0f0274872c8662
path + /home/op/w/got
blob - 7d479df74800ae6ac1809d68db5f4d54482efd23
file + lib/privsep.c
--- lib/privsep.c
+++ lib/privsep.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ got_privsep_send_tree_req(struct imsgbuf *ibuf, int fd
 		}
 	}
 
-	wbuf->fd = fd;
+	ibuf_fd_set(wbuf, fd);
 	imsg_close(ibuf, wbuf);
 
 	return flush_imsg(ibuf);
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ got_privsep_send_fetch_req(struct imsgbuf *ibuf, int f
 			return err;
 		}
 	}
-	wbuf->fd = fd;
+	ibuf_fd_set(wbuf, fd);
 	fd = -1;
 	imsg_close(ibuf, wbuf);