On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 12:19:25PM +0100, Simon Harrison wrote:
> This is probably more for the portable version. My question is: could
> we have a plain CGI version as FCGI is a bit harder to configure on
> Apache.
> 
> I know people may scream "but it's sooooo slow!", however I run
> Mercurial's hgweb on a server and am quite happy with the speed.

I am not sure this makes much difference, to be honest.  fcgi is configurable
under Apache.

I certainly don't want to maintain a plain CGI version in gotwebd in
-portable, unless it's upstreamed officially.

Kindly,
Thomas