"GOT", but the "O" is a cute, smiling pufferfish. Index | Thread | Search

From:
Tracey Emery <tracey@traceyemery.net>
Subject:
Re: add remove but keep files
To:
gameoftrees@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:04:42 -0700

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Klemens Nanni:

    add remove but keep files

  • On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
    > 
    > Hmm, that seems kind of long-winded. Could we use a single sentence like:
    >  'got status' will report affected file as deleted until the next commit,
    >  and as unversioned after the next commit.
    > 
    > Or perhaps documenting this is not such a good idea after all?
    > status 'D' and '?' are kind of obvious expected results.
    > 
    > Your call :)
    > 
    > Looks great otherwise!
    
    I think we are fine with the one liner: Keep affected files on disk. Of
    course, I need to redo the patch to integrate with your work in
    schedule_for_deletion, so, I'll pump out another diff for review before
    commiting.
    
    -- 
    
    Tracey Emery
    
    
    
  • Klemens Nanni:

    add remove but keep files