On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 01:04:42PM -0700, Tracey Emery wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > 
> > Hmm, that seems kind of long-winded. Could we use a single sentence like:
> >  'got status' will report affected file as deleted until the next commit,
> >  and as unversioned after the next commit.
> > 
> > Or perhaps documenting this is not such a good idea after all?
> > status 'D' and '?' are kind of obvious expected results.
> > 
> > Your call :)
> > 
> > Looks great otherwise!
> 
> I think we are fine with the one liner: Keep affected files on disk. Of
> course, I need to redo the patch to integrate with your work in
> schedule_for_deletion, so, I'll pump out another diff for review before
> commiting.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Tracey Emery

Nevermind. It was obvious what you did. Committed.

-- 

Tracey Emery