On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> here's a revised diff.  it's equivalent in practice to the previous one,
> but hopefully less scary :)

Thanks, this looks more compact and nicer indeed.

> P.S.: now that I think of it, there's still a thing that can be
> improved.  I went with compat/landlock.c because it was an easy way to
> add the support, but should we move that file elsewhere?

I don't see anything wrong with it living at compat/landlock.c,
and I don't have a better suggestion.