Mark Jamsek:

> In any case, while I like the timeout, I'm not strongly attached to it
> and am happy to run with what you think is best. I don't want to
> continue with the diff if you think we should can it.

I'm in favor of completely removing the timeout for the count prefix.

I'm also not fond of echoing the count prefix in bold.  Does anybody
like this?  less(1) certainly does not do this.

> The only other thing related to this that I plan on doing if there
> are no objections is implement the nG behaviour like vi(1) and
> less(1).

Yes, please!

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de