On 22-06-29 09:59pm, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Mark Jamsek:
> 
> > In any case, while I like the timeout, I'm not strongly attached to it
> > and am happy to run with what you think is best. I don't want to
> > continue with the diff if you think we should can it.
> 
> I'm in favor of completely removing the timeout for the count prefix.
> 
> I'm also not fond of echoing the count prefix in bold.  Does anybody
> like this?  less(1) certainly does not do this.

I sent through an updated patch in a new thread based on this.

> > The only other thing related to this that I plan on doing if there
> > are no objections is implement the nG behaviour like vi(1) and
> > less(1).
> 
> Yes, please!

:)

-- 
Mark Jamsek <fnc.bsdbox.org>
GPG: F2FF 13DE 6A06 C471 CA80  E6E2 2930 DC66 86EE CF68